Sononym of self assess7/22/2023 However, it was greeted with fury by the unions that represent civil servants because the award was lower than the offer made to other public sector workers, such as NHS staff, and it was awarded without consultation. Ministers had initially awarded a pay rise of up to 4.5%, with lower pay bands receiving an extra 0.5% on top of that. The government has announced a new pay offer for civil servants that it hopes will bring disputes to an end. Not for the first time, the prime minister appears to be focussing on principle while ignoring the politics – and opening himself up to danger in the process. Remember, Mr Johnson already has beef with the part of the state apparatus he’s attempting to run rings round.Īs well as being closely involved in the COVID inquiry, the Cabinet Office has also been handling issues connected to partygate and the privileges committee investigation into the former prime minister.Īs for the current inhabitant of Downing Street, with even one of his own minsters suggesting the government is likely to lose its judicial review, Rishi Sunak is now running the risk of taking legal action that has next to no practical upside. Through bypassing the government – and its legal spat over what records are released – the former prime minister is painting himself as the honest truth-seeker and those in Whitehall as the diffuse obstructionists. "The accommodation offered to asylum seekers by providers, on a no-choice basis, is of a decent standard and meets all legal and contractual requirements."īoris Johnson says handing his WhatsApp messages direct to the Covid Inquiry is about process.īut there’s plenty of politics at play too. He added: "It is not right, nor is it in the interest of these individuals – or our residents – to have them forced to endure a night on the streets because their transition into new accommodation has not been properly managed."Ī Home Office spokesman said: "Despite the number of people arriving in the UK reaching record levels, we continue to provide accommodation – at a cost of £6 million a day – for asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, to meet our legal obligation. "I would ask that you urgently clarify how this was allowed to happen, why this was acceptable, and why no communication was made with the local authority to alert us." In his letter to the home secretary on Thursday, he wrote: "Neither the Home Office nor the hotel itself responded to this incident, ultimately leaving it to council officers to manage and support this large group overnight. He accused the government of creating "safeguarding and health risks", and noted that "leaving them on the street for multiple nights is not an alternative". Mr Hug said that asking people who "are likely to have been through significant and traumatic events" to share "an inappropriately-sized room with multiple strangers defies common sense and basic decency". The group reportedly refused to enter a Pimlico hotel after the Home Office had asked them to sleep "four people per room".īy Friday morning, 20 asylum seekers were camped outside the Comfort Inn in protest at the cramped conditions inside, the council said, where they remained until the afternoon. The leader of Westminster council has written to Home Secretary Suella Braverman asking her to "urgently clarify" why a large group of asylum seekers were “left on the street” in Westminster for two nights running.Īdam Hug expressed his "deep concern" that around 40 refugees were placed in the borough on Wednesday night "without appropriate accommodation or support available" and no prior communication with the local authority.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |